Registry Metadata Quality Assessment by the Example of re3data.org Schema
Keywords:
Data Repository Registry, Institutional Repository, re3data.org, Metadata SchemaAbstract
Nowadays, research data repositories (RDR) have become progressively widespread all over the world. To expand repository services and build up inbound linking strategy, organizations list their repositories with so called Global Registries. Accordingly, such registries should be carefully described by the related data. In this study, we explore the metadata schema of re3data.org. We collect and analyze descriptions from the listed repositories, and come up with some suggestions concerning possible improvements to the metadata schema. To accomplish this, we develop a crawler program, which collects necessary data from the re3data.org. Based on the analysis results, we have identified two issues that required elements is missing, one issue that required element value is missing when the corresponding property is applied, five inconsistency issues with re3data controlled vocabulary, six issues with undescribed optional elements, and two inconsistency issues between the elements and their attributes which do not pair with. We believe this discussion can facilitate improvements to the existing re3data.org schema and further help researchers who analyze data repository trends.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- The Copyright of reserch papers already or will be published in the jounal shall belong to RIKCDT, and by submitting a manuscript, the copyright is consider to be transferred to RIKCDT.
- No dispute shall be raised on matters RIKCDT already managed on research papers published in previous journal.
- Once publication of the paper is confirmed, Copyright tansfer agreement shall be submitted.